Find out more information about  
MARCUM LLP
Fill out this form and a representative will contact you.
*
*
*
*
*
Captcha Image
 
Contact Us
 
29
mar
2013
In the Name of Fairness

The U.S. Supreme Court is once again in a position to make history. This week, the Justices took up the issue of whether the definition of marriage should extend to same-sex married couples. The essential question being considered by the Court is: should gay marriage be a right that is recognized by the federal government?

I, for one, think it's about time for the debate on this to come to an end. It's 2013. I am hoping the Supreme Court realizes that people should be able to legally marry the person of their choice, gay or straight, with all the rights, obligations and benefits that are attached. In nine states and the District of Columbia, this is already the case. The federal definition of marriage should be expanded to include all marriages in those states and in others that may permit same-sex marriage in the future. To continue the present double standard flies in the face of fairness and equitable treatment under the law.

There was a time in this country when slavery was common practice; U.S. Presidents owned slaves right up until Ulysses S. Grant. Women couldn't vote and were not considered to be peers of men. Black people couldn't attend the same schools, eat in the same restaurants or ride in the same bus seats as white people. And women didn't have the right to choose. The Court took care of the latter with the landmark Roe v. Wade decision of 1973. Forty years hence, the Justices now need to do the same for gay marriage and vacate the misguided law that subverts this basic human right.

It turns out that even President Bill Clinton, who in 1996 signed into law the bill defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman, has disavowed the Defense of Marriage Act entirely, urging that the law be overturned by the Supreme Court. Hurray for you, Mr. President! It is refreshing to see that people, including the man who signed the bill into law, are capable of realizing that what may have seemed like a good idea at the time, no longer works, and of taking steps to correct it.

Marcum started an LGBT practice last year, led by our partner Nanette Lee Miller. This practice has been an extraordinary success due to the legal complexities and financial issues facing LGBT couples, which are not shared by married heterosexuals. It's mind-boggling that non-traditional families do not share the same income tax treatment, estate tax benefits, medical benefits and other favored status that many of us take for granted.

I have close friends and business associates who today can't enjoy the same benefits and rights that I do. They deserve – and are entitled to – better. Redefining marriage to include same-sex families is the right thing to do to secure the principle of equal protection and ensure the continued evolution of civil liberty in our society.

We may have gotten a hint of what's to come from the Court during oral arguments on California's Proposition 8, which reinstated a ban on same-sex marriage in that state. In response to the argument that one of the main tenets of the institution of marriage is procreation, the Justices asked if 55-year-olds should therefore not be allowed to marry. Let's hope their deliberations on DOMA are equally guided by common sense.

Go Back
Disclaimer

The opinions expressed in this column are solely those of Jeffrey M. Weiner and do not represent those of Marcum LLP, its partners or its employees.

Meet Jeffrey M. Weiner
View Jeffrey Weiner's Profile View Profile
Download Jeffrey Weiner's Contact Card Download vCard
Connect with Jeffrey Weiner on LinkedIn Connect with Jeffrey Weiner
Follow Jeffrey Weiner on Twitter Follow Jeffrey Weiner
 
Subscription Preferences
Subscribe
Unsubscribe
Recent Posts
Change Is In the Air
Tradition of Service
Buckle Up
Because You Count
 
Archives
2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
2015
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
2014
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
2013
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
   
   

Offices
New York
New Jersey
Connecticut
Florida
Massachusetts
Rhode Island
California
Pennsylvania
Tennessee
Illinois
China
Grand Cayman

Get in Touch
Name
Email
Message

Get Connected
     
Privacy | Legal | Sitemap | Secure Mail