The Re-IPO: An Emerging Strategy for Greater Growth and Enhanced Capital Market Access
By Spencer G. Feldman, Shareholder, Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Common from 2004 to 2008, reverse mergers with concurrent private placements emerged as the primary going public route for smaller companies, resulting from a dormant initial public offering (IPO) market but relatively easy availability of PIPE (private-investment, public-equity) financing. In a typical reverse merger transaction, at the closing of a private placement, a private operating company merged with a wholly-owned subsidiary of a publicly traded corporation, which will not have had any material assets or liabilities. The publicly traded corporation, whose shares were quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, changed its corporate name to that of the private operating company and, with the proceeds of the private placement, continued the existing business of the private operating company under its management as a publicly traded company. From the company’s perspective, the key benefits of the reverse merger were speed in terms of implementation and simplicity of valuation. The reverse merger required only a comparatively simple SEC filing under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with no prior review process.
But, by the third quarter of 2007, the deal environment dramatically deteriorated, leaving many of these small companies “stranded,” without a lifeline to continual investor funding.
Since the fall of 2009, the vastly improved condition of the public equity markets and a number of changes in the federal securities laws have rewarded those post-reverse merger companies that survived the economic downturn and capitalized on strategic consolidation opportunities.
The fittest of these companies, i.e., those with market-accepted product lines, scalable business models, proprietary technology and experienced management teams, are now entering the mainstream of U.S. public companies through re-IPO’s, a process that typically requires three to four months to complete. The re-IPO can be divided into the following five steps:
Step 1: Nasdaq/NYSE Amex Application
Step 2: Reverse Stock Split of Outstanding Shares
While, from a mathematical standpoint, the price for shares of the company’s common stock after the reverse split will be greater than the price for shares of common stock immediately before the reverse stock split (depending on the actual exchange ratio), experience shows that the new price level is infrequently sustained. As a result, Nasdaq and NYSE Amex routinely require some period of time (ranging anywhere from five consecutive trading days to one month) for the stock to trade above the minimum bid price before an application is approved.
To effect a reverse stock split, in most states, the company will be required to prepare and file preliminary proxy materials with the SEC and, following SEC review, final proxy materials for dissemination to the company’s shareholders in advance of a special meeting of shareholders. Many post-reverse merger companies with a small group of controlling shareholders may be able to act by written consent, and file an information statement with the SEC instead of a proxy statement (but which includes substantially the same information). In parallel with the SEC process, a company whose shares are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board will also need to make certain notice filings with FINRA to coordinate the timing and pricing of the stock split. Absent significant SEC review, the proxy or information statement process should last, from preparation to SEC clearance, approximately four to six weeks, with an additional four weeks for the mailing of a proxy statement and holding a stockholders meeting.
Step 3: Stock Price at Exchange Minimum Levels
An essential element of this strategy is clear communication in the company’s proxy or information statement, which is mailed to the company’s shareholders in printed format and easily accessed through the EDGAR system, that the purpose of the reverse stock split is to facilitate both an uplisting and future equity offerings. These materials will form the talking points for the company’s investment banking firm and investor relations firm, if they are already in place. The company should attempt to convince the market of the appropriateness of its proposed course.
Step 4: Underwritten Public Offering
As a result, post-reverse merger public companies — many of which have not had any prior “Wall Street sponsorship,” especially Chinese-based businesses — are attracting the interest of small and midcap investment banks as the equity markets have opened up. Although acting formally as underwriters in the capital-raising phase of the public offering, the investment banks actually serve a much broader corporate structuring and advisory role in the re-IPO process. As contrasted with “follow-on” public offerings by mature exchange-listed issuers, post-reverse merger public companies with limited trading often require a second look at valuation as potential investors are not inclined to assume that the trading price is truly reflective of the value of the company and risk involved. Instead, offerings appear to be priced based on the company’s earnings multiples and stock prices of larger public companies in the same industry during a comparable period of their corporate lives. Post-reverse merger public companies also typically require simplification of their balance sheets through conversions of outstanding preferred stock and shareholder loans.
Depending on the stage of the company’s development and prevailing market conditions, re-IPO public offerings have commonly ranged in size from between $5 million and $50 million in aggregate gross proceeds. A company with a sizable accumulated deficit on its balance sheet will need to raise a greater amount of offering proceeds to satisfy the exchange’s minimum stockholders’ equity listing standard. For companies that also are not profitable, the exchanges have required an even higher stockholders’ equity threshold, increasing that minimum level by an amount equal to a year’s cash burn rate. At the top end of the offering size range, multiple investment banking firms have acted as co-managers.
The company’s registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC may be its first public disclosure written with the assistance of the critical eye of an investment banker and its counsel. Often, the Form S-1 will feature a fresh positioning of the company and its business that goes beyond the Exchange Act reports previously filed by the company. Investment banks and their counsel typically aid in the preparation of a more complete and accurate business description, following significant legal and business due diligence. At this point, the company’s business description should focus on the reverse merger company, with only a brief overview on the background of the predecessor public entity and the reverse merger or similar transaction. In the offering and capitalization sections of the registration statement relating to outstanding shares (as well as in the company’s historical financial statements including its balance sheet, stock-based compensation and earnings per share disclosures), giving effect to post-reverse stock split share and per share amounts adds to the “new company” feel of the transaction. With the active participation of company management and its underwriters, and with its new company focus, a full-blown SEC review process lasting from six to eight weeks may be limited or avoided altogether. This will allow the company to more quickly distribute a “red herring” prospectus and commence its marketing efforts.
Additionally, the public offering process provides an opportune time for the company, with the advice and assistance of its investment bankers, to:
Finally, key to a re-IPO is the use of the public offering proceeds for growth-oriented purposes, such as mergers and acquisitions, and product development programs to expand into ancillary businesses. A smaller amount of the proceeds could also be used to purchase outstanding warrants issued in prior private placement financings to reduce the negative “overhang” effect on the company’s stock. During the time prior to the re-IPO, the company’s PIPE financing (and, if applicable, any bridge financing) should already have been used to ensure sufficient working capital to implement and execute its core business plan.
Step 5: Trading on Nasdaq/NYSE Amex
Spencer G. Feldman is a shareholder in the New York City offices of Greenberg Traurig, LLP. The views expressed in this article are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, the other attorneys of that firm or Marcum LLP. Portions of this article previously appeared in Insights (February 2011).